Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided April 7, 1998No. COA97-722PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMMONS-GOODSON, Judge.

Plaintiffs Bradley R. Morgan, his wife, Tonja D. Morgan, and their son, Bradley Dale Morgan, instituted this declaratory judgment action against defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (hereinafter “State Farm”) in order to resolve the following issues: (1) whether State Farm properly informed them with regards to underin-sured (hereinafter “UIM”) coverage; (2) whether they had properly rejected UIM coverage; and (3) whether plaintiffs have UIM coverage in the same policy limits as their uninsured (hereinafter “UM”) coverage. State Farm subsequently…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. ChantosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  5. Pierce Concrete, Inc. v. Cannon Realty & Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Pinney v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  2. Purcell v. DowneyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  3. Morgan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  4. Trosch v. State Farm Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API