Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Downey

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 3, 2004No. COA03-347PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ELMORE, Judge.

Defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) contends the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment and granting summary judgment in favor of plaintiffs Robert and Mary Purcell in a declaratory judgment action to determine whether underinsured motorist (UIM) coverage was available to plaintiffs under two automobile insurance policies issued by State Farm. We agree, and therefore reverse the trial court’s order.

The parties stipulated to the following facts: on 29 June 1997, plaintiffs were seriously injured when their motorcycle was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blades v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Sutton v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Smith v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  4. Pinney v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  5. Bass v. North Carolina Farm Bureau Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Stevens v. HellerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  2. Transatlantic Healthcare, LLC v. Alpha Constr. of the Triad, Inc.North Carolina Business Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API