Legal Opinion

Kammerer v. Marino

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 24, 1926No. Docket No. 3063PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an appeal on the judgment-roll alone from the judgment herein in favor of plaintiff.

The complaint states separately five causes of action. The first count alleges the delivery of a certain quantity of grapes by plaintiff to defendants at an agreed price. The second alleges that “at the special instance and request of defendants plaintiff furnished boxes for said grapes to the value of $1493.57.” The third alleges that “Phillip Ehersman sold and delivered to defendants at their special instance . . . 5876 pounds of grapes at $75 per ton,” and that Ehersman assigned his claim therefor…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Silvers v. GrossmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Gray v. BekinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Robinson v. American Fish & Oyster Co.California Court of Appeal · 1911
  4. Hertel v. EmireckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Fairchild v. Bay Point & Clayton RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
  2. Ansco Construction Co. v. Ocean View Estates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1959
  3. Worthington Corp. v. El Chicote Ranch Properties, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Lacy Manufacturing Co. v. Gold Crown Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API