Legal Opinion
Novakovic v. Samutin
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided November 12, 2004No. 1-03-1382PublishedCited by 24 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman
Plaintiff Vladimir Novakovic filed suit against defendants George Samutin (Samutin) and Guaranteed Financial Mortgage Service, Inc. (Guaranteed), alleging violations of the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (12 U.S.C. § 2607 (1994)) (RESPA), the Truth in Lending Act (15 U.S.C. § 1638 (1994)) (TILA), and the Illinois Consumer Fraud and Deceptive Business Practices Act (815 ILCS 505/2 (West 2002)) (the Act), as well as a common law breach of fiduciary duty, for defendants’ failure to disclose a payment to Samutin following the closing and disbursement of a home mortgage refinancing…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- AFM Messenger Service, Inc. v. Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- People v. MaggetteIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Morris v. MargulisIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
- Carpetland U.S.A., Inc. v. Illinois Department of Employment SecurityIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Lonnie Glover Dawn Glover v. Standard Federal Bank, Heartland MortgageCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Thomas Costello v. BeavEx, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Landers-Scelfo v. Corporate Office System, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Marcus & Millichap Investment Services of Chicago, Inc. v. SekulovskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Johnson v. Matrix Financial Services Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2004
- White v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.