Legal Opinion
Johnson v. Matrix Financial Services Corp.
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided December 9, 2004No. 1-03-2820PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn
The following facts, taken as true, appear in plaintiffs’ dismissed, third-amended complaint: In March 2000, plaintiffs Evon and Robert Johnson retained the services of a mortgage broker, Dolphin Mortgage Corporation (Dolphin), “to act as their exclusive broker to obtain a mortgage loan for them.” Plaintiffs directed Dolphin to obtain a 30-year mortgage loan for $173,569 at “the specific interest rate of 8.75%” and authorized Dolphin to receive up to 3.5% of the loan proceeds as its compensation. If Dolphin could not find a mortgage with the terms plaintiffs requested, Dolphin would receive…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Robinson v. Toyota Motor Credit Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 2002
- Vernon v. SchusterIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Randy Cohen v. American Security Insurance, CCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
- Ramirez v. Smart Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007
- Sklodowski v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
- Dod Technologies v. Mesirow Ins. ServicesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- DOD Technologies v. Mesierow Insurance Services, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2008
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.