Legal Opinion

State v. Armstrong

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 10, 1980No. 47, 105, September Term, 1980PublishedCited by 2 opinions

September Term, 1980.]

1Opinion of the CourtWilner, J.

Two wrongs may not make a right, but they can create some sticky issues on appeal, which are what we have here.

The first wrong was committed by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County; it acted precipitously in dismissing pending indictments against appellees when the Court of Appeals filed its first Opinion in State v. Hicks, 285 Md. 310 (1979). The State then compounded the error when it aborted its appeals from those actions and attempted to salvage the prosecutions by obtaining new indictments. The question before us is whether the Circuit Court again erred when it frustrated that attempt…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. State v. HicksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. WhitakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Crockett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Parks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Payne v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  2. State v. GlennCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API