Payne v. State
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MOYLAN, Judge.
Like the Trojan Horse through the gates of Troy, the appellant, Francis Stewart Payne, would like to slip a speedy trial claim prematurely into the appellate citadel disguised as a double jeopardy claim. It shall not pass.
The appellant was initially charged in Montgomery County under a three-count criminal information accusing him of 1) conspiracy to murder, 2) solicitation to murder, and 3) a related handgun offense. When the case was called for trial, the defense moved to dismiss the charges for failure to comply with Maryland Rule 4-271 (“the Hicks Rule”). The first trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- Blondes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
- Parrott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- State v. ShiedCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008