Legal Opinion

Payne v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 21, 1988No. 703 September Term, 1987PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOYLAN, Judge.

Like the Trojan Horse through the gates of Troy, the appellant, Francis Stewart Payne, would like to slip a speedy trial claim prematurely into the appellate citadel disguised as a double jeopardy claim. It shall not pass.

The appellant was initially charged in Montgomery County under a three-count criminal information accusing him of 1) conspiracy to murder, 2) solicitation to murder, and 3) a related handgun offense. When the case was called for trial, the defense moved to dismiss the charges for failure to comply with Maryland Rule 4-271 (“the Hicks Rule”). The first trial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crist v. BretzSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Neal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Blondes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  4. Parrott v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. Stewart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. State v. ShiedCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1989
  3. In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  4. In Re Kevin E.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API