Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Whitaker

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 12, 1976No. 517; 19PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

MANDERINO, Justice.

On March 25, 1974, appellee, James Whitaker, along with two others, was arrested and charged with four counts of murder and one count of criminal conspiracy. Indictments followed on all charges. On December 17, 1974, two hundred sixty-eight days after appellee’s arrest, the prosecution moved, pursuant to Rule 314, Pa.R. Crim.P., for leave to enter a nolle prosequi in the case against appellee on the grounds that it had no admissible evidence with which to prosecute the case. The prosecution’s lack of evidence resulted from the grant of a motion to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  3. Commonwealth v. DiPasqualeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Commonwealth v. WoodsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Commonwealth v. McLaughlinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GenoveseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. BradfordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012
  3. Commonwealth v. GoldmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. Barbour, D., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API