Legal Opinion

People v. Lopez

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2003No. S106681PublishedCited by 86 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

The crime of carjacking requires the “felonious taking” of a motor vehicle. (Pen. Code, § 215.) Similarly, the crime of robbery requires the “felonious taking” of personal property. (§ 211.) California courts, following common law, have long held that the “taking” element of robbery requires that a defendant gain possession of the victim’s property and asport or carry it away. (See People v. Cooper (1991) 53 Cal.3d 1158, 1165 [282 Cal.Rptr. 450, 811 P.2d 742] (Cooper); Perkins & Boyce, Criminal Law (3d ed. 1982) § 2, pp. 343-344 (Perkins).) Does the felonious taking element of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Carter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. People v. HarrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by86 opinions

  1. People v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. CapistranoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  3. People v. LicasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. People v. GomezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Silicon Valley Taxpayers' Ass'n v. Santa Clara County Open Space AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008

81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API