Legal Opinion

Schankin v. Buskirk

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1958No. Docket 46, Calendar 47,405PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Plaintiffs seek treble damages under tbe statute, * for a trespass in the course of which several trees on their land were cut down. At the time that plaintiffs, a young man and his wife, purchased the, parcel of land in question, there were few houses in the neighborhood, the street that ran by had not yet been paved, and their land and the land adjoining, as well, were thickly wooded. They intended to build there and they had chosen the parcel, which is part' of a suburban land development near Detroit, for the beauty of its large trees. They pictured these as surrounding their future home.

W…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Schneider v. PomervilleMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Basin Oil Co. v. Baash-Ross Tool Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
  5. Gilman v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. David ARCHER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MACOMB COUNTY BANK, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Schewe v. Fairview Estates (In Re Schewe)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1989
  4. Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  5. John E. Green Plumbing and Heating Company, Inc. v. Turner Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API