Legal Opinion

Toth v. California University of Pennsylvania

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 9, 2012No. Civil Action No. 09-1692PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NORA BARRY FISCHER, District Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter comes before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment filed by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. Docket Nos. 47 & 49. For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (Docket No. 47) will be denied, and the Defendants’ motion for summary judgment (Docket No. 49) will be granted, in part and denied, in part.

II. Background

California University of Pennsylvania (“California” or “the University”) is a post-secondary educational institution existing within…

2Cases cited103 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000

98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Brown v. TucciDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  2. Summy-Long v. Pennsylvania State UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
  3. Gross-Jones v. Mercy MedicalDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2012
  4. Ickes v. GrassmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Adams v. SpringmeyerDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API