Legal Opinion

Sinclair v. Roth

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 27, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

811 A.2d 460 (2002)

356 N.J. Super. 4

Esther A. SINCLAIR, as Executrix of the Estate of William A. Sinclair and Esther A. Sinclair, as Executrix Ad Prosequendum on behalf of the heirs of William A. Sinclair, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Steven B. ROTH, M.D., Defendant-Respondent, and

Francis Bottone, M.D., Roxbury Family Practice, John Doe, M.D. 1-50, Jane Doe, M.D. 1-50, John Doe, R.N. 1-50, Jane Doe, R.N. 1-50, John Doe, 1-50, Jane Doe 1-50, John Doe, Corp. 1-50 (fictitious names), Defendants.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued October 8, 2002.

Decided November 27, 2002.

E. Drew…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jenoff v. GleasonNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
  2. Prooth v. WallshNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Reed v. BojarskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2001
  4. O'NEAL v. HammerHawaii Supreme Court · 1998

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Risko v. CioccaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2003
  2. Linquito v. SiegelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Shadwell v. CraigieCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API