O'NEAL v. Hammer
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KLEIN, Justice.
Plaintiff-Appellant Rose O’Neal appeals from the judgment of the First Circuit Court in a dental malpractice case. O’Neal filed claims for lack of informed consent and professional negligence. In her informed consent claim, O’Neal alleged that Defendant-Appellee Dr. Henry Hammer, an orthodontist, and Defendant-Appellee Dr. Lewis Williamson, an oral surgeon (collectively Appel-lees), failed to properly inform her of the risks involved in a surgical procedure, which was performed by Defendant Dr. Ray Ber-ringer. In her professional negligence claim, O’Neal alleged that Appellees…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Johnson v. Whitehurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
- Carr v. StrodeHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
- Halley v. BirbigliaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
- Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Koapke v. HerfendalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Sinclair v. RothNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Mock v. CastroHawaii Supreme Court · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.