Legal Opinion

O'NEAL v. Hammer

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided March 3, 1998No. 19275PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KLEIN, Justice.

Plaintiff-Appellant Rose O’Neal appeals from the judgment of the First Circuit Court in a dental malpractice case. O’Neal filed claims for lack of informed consent and professional negligence. In her informed consent claim, O’Neal alleged that Defendant-Appellee Dr. Henry Hammer, an orthodontist, and Defendant-Appellee Dr. Lewis Williamson, an oral surgeon (collectively Appel-lees), failed to properly inform her of the risks involved in a surgical procedure, which was performed by Defendant Dr. Ray Ber-ringer. In her professional negligence claim, O’Neal alleged that Appellees…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  3. Johnson v. Whitehurst, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1983
  4. Carr v. StrodeHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Halley v. BirbigliaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shanghai Inv. Co., Inc. v. Alteka Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Ketchup v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  3. Koapke v. HerfendalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Sinclair v. RothNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
  5. Mock v. CastroHawaii Supreme Court · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API