Linquito v. Siegel
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
1Opinion of the Court
850 A.2d 537 (2004)
370 N.J. Super. 21
Philomena LINQUITO, as Executrix of the Estate of Arthur Linquito and Philomena Linquito, Individually, Plaintiff-Appellant/Cross-Respondent,
v.
Andrew L. SIEGEL, M.D., Defendant-Respondent/Cross-Appellant.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued May 18, 2004.
Decided June 16, 2004.
Bruce H. Nagel, Livingston, argued the cause for appellant/ cross-respondent (Nagel Rice & Mazie, attorneys; Mr. Nagel, on the brief).
David P. Weeks argued the cause for respondent/ cross-appellant (Ruprecht, Hart & Weeks, attorneys; Lopa N. Patel, on the brief).
Befor…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Jerry W. Canterbury v. William Thornton Spence and the Washington Hospital Center, a Body CorporateCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- Scafidi v. SeilerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Verdicchio v. RiccaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2004
- Perna v. PirozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Largey v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hall v. FrankelColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- Roukounakis v. MesserMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2005
- Shortino v. BunaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2012
- Jandre v. Wisconsin Injured Patients & Families Compensation FundWisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
- Hall v. FrankelColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.