Legal Opinion

Reed v. Bojarski

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 23, 2001PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

LONG, J.

The requirement of a physician’s examination as a condition of employment, often paid for by the prospective employer, is not uncommon. This case focuses on the responsibility of a physician in such circumstances. More particularly, we are confronted with the question whether a physician, performing a pre-employment screening, who determines that the patient has a potentially serious medical condition, can omit informing the patient and delegate by contract to the referring agency the responsibility of notification. The answer is no.

I

The facts…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
  2. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  3. Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. Meena v. WilburnMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Hoover v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Stanley v. McCarverArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Dyer v. TrachtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Rachel A. Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education(075859)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
  5. Michael L. Woodruff v. Stuart Gitlow, M.D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API