Reed v. Bojarski
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
LONG, J.
The requirement of a physician’s examination as a condition of employment, often paid for by the prospective employer, is not uncommon. This case focuses on the responsibility of a physician in such circumstances. More particularly, we are confronted with the question whether a physician, performing a pre-employment screening, who determines that the patient has a potentially serious medical condition, can omit informing the patient and delegate by contract to the referring agency the responsibility of notification. The answer is no.
I
The facts…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Goldberg v. Housing Auth. of City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
- Rogers v. HorvathMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Meena v. WilburnMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- Hoover v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Sharpe v. St. Luke's HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Stanley v. McCarverArizona Supreme Court · 2004
- Dyer v. TrachtmanMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
- Rachel A. Parsons v. Mullica Township Board of Education(075859)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Michael L. Woodruff v. Stuart Gitlow, M.D.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2014
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.