Legal Opinion

Scott v. Christenson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

From Marion: George H. Burnett, Judge. Action by Charles Scott, executor of R. H. Scott, deceased, against M. Christenson and another. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This action was commenced in September, 1904, by Charles Scott, as executor of the last will and testament of R. H. Scott, deceased, to recover the remainder alleged to be due from do*224fendants on their promissory note given to the testator. The complaint alleges the execution of the instrument, the making of a last will by the testator, his death, the probate of the will, the plaintiff’s nomination, appointment and qualification as executor, his right to the note, and also avers:

“That defendants have not paid said note, nor any part thereof, except the sum of $20.50, as interest thereon, paid…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Booth v. MoodyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Griffin v. SheffieldMississippi Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Roseboom v. BillingtonNew York Supreme Court · 1819
  4. Morrison v. WhitesideCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1861
  5. Savage v. SavageOregon Supreme Court · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. CarpenterOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Duby v. HicksOregon Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Ford v. SchallOregon Supreme Court · 1924
  4. McLaughlin v. HeadOregon Supreme Court · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API