Legal Opinion

Chase v. Carney

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1939No. 27297. Department OnePublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

The purpose of this action was to set aside a sheriff’s deed and quiet title to the property covered thereby in the plaintiffs. The trial was to the court without a jury and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the relief which they sought; and from the judgment entered dismissing the complaint and quieting the title in the defendant Elvin P. Carney, the plaintiffs appealed.

The preliminary facts may be summarized as follows: In 1922, water district No. 7, in King county, was organized. Within the district there was created a local…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wick v. ReaWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Caldwell v. BiggerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Drum v. University Place Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Sparks v. Standard Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Schmelling v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court · 1920

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Martin v. MeierWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. White v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  3. McKenzie v. Mukilteo Water DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Brenner v. Port of BellinghamCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  5. Wingard v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API