Traverso v. People ex rel. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAVIS, J.
Plaintiff Richard Traverso does business as ADCO Outdoor Advertising (ADCO). ADCO applied for a permit to place a billboard. Defendant Department of Transportation (Caltrans)1 denied the application. ADCO unsuccessfully petitioned for a writ of traditional mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) to overturn this determination. On appeal, ADCO maintains Caltrans and the trial court misconstrued the scope of the authority vested in Caltrans by the Outdoor Advertising Act (the Act) (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 5200 et seq. [undesignated section references will be to this code]) to require…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Rojo v. KligerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Whitcomb Hotel, Inc. v. California Employment CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Sea & Sage Audubon Society, Inc. v. Planning CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Ex parte ChristensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- People v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Traverso v. PEOPLE EX REL. DEPT. OF TRANSP.California Court of Appeal · 1996