Legal Opinion

Oremus v. Oregonian Publishing Company

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 1, 1972No. 366-897Published

1Opinion of the Court

503 P.2d 722 (1972)

In the matter of the Compensation of Daniel OREMUS, Claimant.

Daniel Oremus, Plaintiff,

v.

The OREGONIAN PUBLISHING COMPANY and the Oregon Journal, Respondents,

Albert Leibrand, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 26, 1972.

Decided December 1, 1972.

Review Denied January 30, 1973.

Scott M. Kelley, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Mize, Kriesien, Fewless, Cheney & Kelley, Portland.

Thomas M. Triplett, Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Wayne A. Williamson and Souther, Spaulding,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. SilkSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Bowser v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Wallowa Valley Stages, Inc. v. Oregonian Publishing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Harris v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Landberg v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API