Legal Opinion

Bundy v. Sierra Lumber Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 1, 1906No. Sac. No. 1274PublishedCited by 30 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Morrison & Cope, C. H. Wilson, and A. M. McCoy, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.

This action is brought by plaintiff to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in the discharge of his duty while in the employment of defendant. Plaintiff on September 23, 1901, was an engineer engaged in operating a “logging train” over the railroad of defendant in hauling logs from Beale Camp to its mill at Lyonsville, a distance of about fifteen miles. The railroad of defendant between these points crossed a high trestle known as the “Big Wible Trestle,” which, while the plaintiff was passing over it on the date mentioned with a “logging train,” went down with the engine and cars,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Sappenfield v. Main Street & Agricultural Park RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Rush v. FrenchArizona Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Krogg v. Atlanta & West Point RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  5. Crocker v. CarpenterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. People v. PartidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  2. People v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Atherley v. MacDonald, Young & Nelson, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Cramer v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API