Legal Opinion

Gariepy v. Springer

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 20, 1943No. Gen. No. 42,436PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Friend

Fred A. Gariepy filed a complaint in chancery seeking to restrain defendant, Max A. Springer, “from further issuing, uttering, mailing, preparing or causing to be prepared and mailed or delivered manually, or in any other manner,” a certain circular alleged to be libelous, or any similar communication. A temporary injunction issued without notice. Thereafter defendant answered the complaint, and plaintiff filed an additional count for damages. Defendant then moved for trial by jury on the additional count, but his motion was denied and he was ordered to answer the additional count. The matter…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. American Malting Co. v. KeitelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  2. Francis v. FlinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  3. Citizens' Light, Heat & Power Co. v. Montgomery Light & Water Power Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Alabama · 1909
  4. Kidd v. HorryUnited States Circuit Court · 1886
  5. Vassar College v. Loose-Wiles Biscuit Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Greenberg v. BurglassSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969
  2. Kwass v. KerseyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Mazzocone v. WillingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  4. Montgomery Ward & Co. v. United Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Employees of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1946
  5. Rozema v. QuinnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API