Legal Opinion
Greenberg v. Burglass
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided November 10, 1969No. 49665PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMLIN, Justice:
Herein, the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, affirmed the judgment of the trial court which forever enjoined, restrained, and prohibited Anna Burglass De Salvo 1 from:
“a) Entering upon the property of Nathan Greenberg situated at 848 Second Street, Gretna, Louisiana, and his residence, at 45 Smithway, Gretna, Louisiana, and:
“b) Uttering, publishing, circulating or disseminating any documents or statements, oral or written, designating and referring to petitioner, Nathan Greenberg, as ‘a crook’, ‘a crooked lawyer’, and/or ‘a slimy kike’, or words of similar import or meaning.”…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Mireille R. Alberti v. Mary Ruth CruiseCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- West v. Town of WinnsboroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1968
- Kennedy v. Item Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Vartech Systems, Inc. v. HaydenLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2006
- Steven M. Kramer v. Richard ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Plaquemines Parish Com'n Council v. PerezSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
- Sid Dillon Chevrolet-Oldsmobile-Pontiac, Inc. v. SullivanNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- Lemeshewsky v. DumaineLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1985
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.