Legal Opinion

Schauland v. Schmaltz

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 11, 1961No. 50206PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The plaintiffs, who are husband and wife, own Lot 6 of Orange Street Addition to the city of Muscatine. Adjoining it on the north is Lot 5 of the same addition, title to which is in defendant Gremmell and which is sold to defendants Schmaltz, husband and wife, through an installment payment contract.

The controversy here concerns a strip about four and one-half feet wide lying along the boundary between the two lots. According to a survey made at the instance of defendant Grem mell this tract is a part of Lot 5 by proper measurements. But for many years there has existed along the north line…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Miller v. LawlorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  2. Concannon v. BlackmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. In Re Smith's WillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. Maes v. OlmstedMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Trimpl v. MeyerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kendall v. LowtherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984
  2. Dart v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  3. Halverson v. Village of DeerwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  4. Alcorn v. LinkeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  5. Cozad v. StrackSupreme Court of Iowa · 1963

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API