Legal Opinion

United States v. Desiree International U. S. A., Ltd.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided July 31, 1980No. 79 Civ. 2646 (RLC)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERT L. CARTER, District Judge.

This is an action by the United States to recover liquidated customs duties from an importer of foreign goods, Desiree International U.S.A., Ltd. (“Desiree”), and its surety, St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company (“St. Paul”). The government, arguing that defendants’ obligation to pay the duties in question has become final under section 514 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“Act”), 19 U.S.C. § 1514, has moved for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. For the reasons given below, the motion is denied, summary judgment is ordered in…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. HirschSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  4. National Automatic Laundry and Cleaning Council v. George P. Shultz, Secretary, U. S. Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
  5. GEORATOR CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Cherry Hill Textiles, Inc., and International Cargo and Surety Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  2. George Weintraub & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. United States v. Hanover Insurance Co.United States Court of International Trade · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API