Legal Opinion

In Re Tate

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 2006No. F047529PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

GOMES, J.

The Department of Corrections (Department) appeals the lower court’s granting a writ of habeas corpus to inmate, Breonne Tate. During Tate’s incarceration on a four-year six-month prison term for a violent felony, Tate was convicted of a nonviolent in-prison offense and sentenced to a fully consecutive two-year term. Because the four-year six-month term was for a violent felony, the Department applied Penal Code section 2933. l’s 1 limitation on credits to the terms on both convictions. The trial court partially granted Tate’s petition for writ, finding the statute’s…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. LangstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. In Re ReevesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
  3. People v. McCartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. ReedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re TrejoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. In re Williams, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. In Re MaesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  4. In re BorlikCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. In Re GomezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API