Legal Opinion
In re Williams
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided June 20, 2018No. B286241PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtZelon, J.
*796On December 29, 2016, the Board of Parole Hearings found Petitioner Antuan Williams suitable for parole under the youth offender provisions of Penal Code sections 3051 and 4801, subdivision (c). Although that decision became final on April 24, 2017, Williams was not released but required to serve an additional consecutive, eight-year term for a conviction he sustained while in prison when he was 26 years old. Williams argues that the Board's decision requiring him to serve the consecutive term after he was granted parole was unlawful. We agree.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
In 1991, Williams, then age 21,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Miller v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Korea Supply Co. v. Lockheed Martin Corp.California Supreme Court · 2003
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- (HC) Meza v. St. AndreDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- In re BoltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- In re BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2024
- In re HowertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- In re HowertonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.