Legal Opinion

People v. Langston

California Supreme Court

Decided August 16, 2004No. S115998PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CHIN, J.

In this sentencing case, we resolve a conflict that has arisen among the Courts of Appeal regarding the proper interpretation of Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b) (hereafter section 667.5(b)), imposing (with exceptions not pertinent here) a consecutive one-year enhancement of the term imposed for conviction of a felony offense “for each prior separate prison term served for any felony.” (All further undesignated statutory references are to the Penal Code.) Does the enhancement provision include and apply to a completed, separate prior prison term served for an escape (§…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  2. People v. EberhardtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. People v. CarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. People v. GarciaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  2. People v. LuaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. In Re PrestonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  4. In Re TateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. People v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API