Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Palo Alto County v. Ulrich

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 11, 1924PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Vermilion, J. —

It appears without dispute that, on February 4, 1919, the board of supervisors of Palo Alto County passed the following resolution:

“Now, to wit, on this 4th day of February, 1919, the same being the regular day of the regular adjourned January session of the board of supervisors of Palo Alto County, Iowa, and matters pertaining to depositing of money in the hands of the county treasurer in banks, as per the amount of their bonds and as provided by Section 1457 of the Code and laws amendatory thereto, having come on for hearing, and it appearing to the board that sums not to…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Easton v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  4. Brown v. Sheldon State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  5. State v. CadwellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hahn v. Clayton CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Leach v. Exchange State BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  3. Andrew v. Colo Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  4. Andrew v. Security Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1932
  5. Olinger v. SandersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API