Legal Opinion

Olinger v. Sanders

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 30, 1931No. 14,146PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWood, J.

Appellant, as a creditor of the Hunting-burg Bank, filed his petition in the Dubois Circuit Court, asking that his claim be allowed and ordered paid by appellee, receiver of said bank, as a preferred claim. This petition was transferred to the trial docket, trial was had, the claim was allowed as a general claim and ordered paid as such. Judgment was entered accordingly. Motion for a new trial was overruled. From said Judgment this appeal is taken.

The following facts are disclosed by the record: The appellant was a contractor engaged in constructing a bridge pursuant to a contract with the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Burton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Chicago v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  3. City of Douglas v. Federal Reserve Bank of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Washington Shoe Manufacturing Co. v. DukeWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Raynor v. Scandinavian-American BankWashington Supreme Court · 1922

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Noble-Trotter Rice Milling Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  2. In re: Indiana State Fair Litigation: Polet v. Mid-America SoundIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
  3. Community State Bank v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Ex Parte Calcasieu-Marine Nat'l BankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  5. Community State Bank v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API