Legal Opinion

State v. Cadwell

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 7, 1890PublishedCited by 52 opinions

Appeal from, Harrison District Court. — Hon. George W. Wakefield, Judge. Indictment for fraudulent banking. From a judgment against defendants, they appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtGranger, J.

The defendants are indicted under chapter 153 of the Laws of the Eighteenth General Assembly, which provides “that no bank, banking house, exchange broker, deposit office, or firm, company, corporation or party engaged in banking, broker, exchange or deposit business shall accept or receive on deposit * * * any moneys, bank bills or notes, or United States treasury notes or currency, or other notes, bills or drafts circulating as money or currency, when such bank, or banking house, exchange broker or deposit office, firm or party is insolvent,” and that “if any such bank, banking house,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Toof v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Brister v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1855
  3. Dutcher v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. Wager v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  5. Merchants' National Bank v. CookSupreme Court of the United States · 1877

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. State v. BradySupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  2. Ellis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State v. WeltyWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Bradley v. ChesebroughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. McCormick v. HopkinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1919

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API