Legal Opinion

Nicholson v. Nicholson

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 17, 1948No. Civ. 16035PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, Acting P. J.

Della M. Nicholson, defendant and cross-complainant, appeals from an order denying her motion to vacate an interlocutory decree of divorce. The ground of the motion was that she was absent from the trial because she had been advised and believed that the court would grant a motion for continuance upon a showing that she was ill in Denver and had been advised by a physician not to make a trip to Los Angeles to attend the trial. On the motion to vacate she filed certain affidavits which she claims proved that her absence from the trial was due to mistake, inadvertence, surprise and excusable…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Litvinuk v. LitvinukCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Hughes v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  3. Porter v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  4. O'Connor v. EllmakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Marr v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kalmus v. KalmusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  2. Price v. HibbsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  3. Cope v. CopeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Iott v. FranklinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. Mann v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API