Legal Opinion
State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 30, 2007No. C-070166PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Dinkelackek, Judge.
{¶ 1} In this original action, relators Richard and Lee Gilbert ask this court for a writ of mandamus compelling respondents, the city of Cincinnati, the Hamilton County Board of Commissioners, and the Metropolitan Sewer District of Greater Cincinnati (“MSD”), to commence an appropriation proceeding because the failure to remedy conditions affecting their property has resulted in a taking for which they are entitled to compensation. The Gilberts are not entitled to a writ.
Investment Property Remains Underdeveloped
{¶ 2} The Gilberts purchased a piece of property in Anderson…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- Hadacheck v. SebastianSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
- Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati, C-070166 (3-13-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
- Blust v. City of Blue AshOhio Court of Appeals · 2008