Blust v. City of Blue Ash
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, John Blust and Ruby Blust, appeal the summary judgment entered by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendant-appellee, city of Blue Ash, Ohio, in a declaratory-judgment action.
The Blusts’ Property and the Surrounding Uses
{¶ 2} The Blusts own a single-family residence on approximately one acre of land. The property is situated on a heavily traveled portion of Kenwood Road in Blue Ash. The home was built in 1920 and has been used as a private residence since the 1940s. Under the city’s zoning ordinances, the property…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- 1946 St. Clair Corp. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Jorg v. Cincinnati Black United FrontOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ehemann Real Estate, Ltd. v. Anderson Twp. Zoning Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- CR Hill, L.L.C. v. WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022