Legal Opinion

Blust v. City of Blue Ash

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2008No. C-070684PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiffs-appellants, John Blust and Ruby Blust, appeal the summary judgment entered by the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas in favor of defendant-appellee, city of Blue Ash, Ohio, in a declaratory-judgment action.

The Blusts’ Property and the Surrounding Uses

{¶ 2} The Blusts own a single-family residence on approximately one acre of land. The property is situated on a heavily traveled portion of Kenwood Road in Blue Ash. The home was built in 1920 and has been used as a private residence since the 1940s. Under the city’s zoning ordinances, the property…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Howard v. FerreriOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. 1946 St. Clair Corp. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Central Motors Corp. v. City of Pepper PikeOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Jorg v. Cincinnati Black United FrontOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ehemann Real Estate, Ltd. v. Anderson Twp. Zoning Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. CR Hill, L.L.C. v. WestlakeOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API