Legal Opinion

Burkholder

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1954No. 673-53PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Where the basis of the plaintiff’s suit against" the United States is not stated in the .petition and the defendant moves to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction, defendant’s motion is granted and the petition dismissed in an opinion per curiam, ás.follows:

Plaintiff sues “to recover damages for injuries' sustained” to his nervous system from'“direct enemy action” while employed on board the SS. Clyde Austin Dunning during World War II.

Defendant moves to dismiss for lack of

jurisdiction.

The motion must be granted. ” The basis of plaintiff’s spit iS not stated. From the amount claimed- it may be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Levine v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1948

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Miraglia v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
  2. Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  3. Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
  4. Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1981
  5. Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API