Legal Opinion
Fort Sill Gardens, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 21, 1966No. 187-63PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DURFEE, Judge.
The present motions were submitted without oral argument to the court for *637its decision. Plaintiff is an Oklahoma corporation organized with an FHA form charter and by-laws in accordance with requirements of the Federal Housing Administration for the purpose of owning and operating a 72-unit garden-type rental housing project, known as Fort Sill Garden Apartments, located at Lawton, Oklahoma.
Fort Sill Gardens was originally constructed in 1952 under section 908, Title IX of the National Housing Act, 12 U.S.C. § 1750g (1964 ed.) The project, although FHA mortgage insured, was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Keifer & Keifer v. Reconstruction Finance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Harvey Ward Locke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1960
- Ray B. Woodbury v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Chain Belt Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1953
- United States v. HuffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gregory Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- FerminUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Lutcher S.A. Celulose E Papel Candoi v. Inter-American Development BankDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- WionUnited States Court of Claims · 1968