Legal Opinion

Baxter v. State Ex Rel. Metcalf

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 25, 1942No. 7 Div. 709PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

This is a proceeding in the nature of quo warranto brought in the name of the State on the relation of one Metcalf who does not make himself a party thereto. No private rights are sought to be protected or enforced, but only the exclusion of defendant from the office of Superintendent of Education of Etowah County which he is alleged to have usurped and is unlawfully holding.

Upon consideration of the pleadings and proof the trial court granted the writ and entered a judgment of ouster against defendant, from which this appeal is prosecuted.

By the common law the matter…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Staples v. State Ex Rel. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. GullattSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. Chilton County v. ButlerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  4. Kirkland v. PilcherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. State ex rel. GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1907

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
  2. State Ex Rel. Bland v. St. JohnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  3. State ex rel. Locke v. SweeneySupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  4. Wynn Ex Rel. Alabama v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1999
  5. Rouse v. WileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API