Legal Opinion

Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. State ex rel. Gray

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 19, 1907PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Heard before Hon. A. I). Sayre. Quo warranto by the state of Alabama, on the relation of Henry B. Gray against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. From a judgment of ouster, defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Montgomery City Court. Heard before Hon. A. I). Sayre. Quo warranto by the state of Alabama, on the relation of Henry B. Gray against the Louisville & Nashville Railroad Company. From a judgment of ouster, defendant appeals. Most of the facts as to the information and pleadings appear in the opinion of the court, but for the purposes of this report it is deemed advisable to set out pleas 16 and 17, which are as follows: 16. The defendant further answering the information or petition filed in said causes pleads and says: That it, the said defendant, is, and has been, for a long…

1Opinion of the CourtDenson, J.

On account of the difficult questions which are presented for consideration by this record, as well as the vast importance of the cause itself, the write? approaches the task of preparing the opinion with great diffidence.- However, counsel on both sides have ably argued, the cause at the bar, and have shown considerable industry and marked ability in briefing it. This has been most helpful to us, and for it all we make grateful acknowledgment.

The action is one in the nature of quo warranto, brought by the state of Alabama, on the relation of Henry B. Gray, against the Louisville & Nashville…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Zabriskie v. Cleveland, Columbus, & Cincinnati RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1860
  2. Nelson v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1892
  3. Highland Avenue & Belt Railroad v. DusenberrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  4. Mobile & Ohio Railroad v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
  5. Cannon v. LindseySupreme Court of Alabama · 1887

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bingham v. Home Brewing Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Appeal of Concerned Corporators of the Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  3. Ham v. State ex rel. BuckSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  4. Harris v. State Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
  5. Randle v. Winona Coal Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1921

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API