Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Rouse v. Wiley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 28, 1983No. 81-964, 81-965PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Dan Wiley, individually and upon the relation of the State of Alabama, as authorized by § 6-6-591, Code 1975, filed two petitions for writ of quo warranto challenging the rights of appellants Conrad Freeman and Ernest Rouse to serve upon the Mobile County Personnel Board. Freeman and Rouse each appeal from adverse judgments entered on separate jury verdicts. We affirm.

The complaints brought against Freeman and Rouse alleged that neither of them was legally holding his respective office as a member of the Mobile County Personnel Board, because neither then lived in the district which he was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashford v. McKeeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
  2. Osborne v. CobbSupreme Court of Alabama · 1982
  3. People Ex Rel. Moran v. TeolisIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Floyd v. State ex rel. BakerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  5. Baxter v. State Ex Rel. MetcalfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Harris v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997
  2. Ex Parte Sierra ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Seaboard System R.R., Inc. v. PageSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  4. Ex Parte Sierra ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  5. Harris v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Alabama · 1997

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API