Legal Opinion

Casitas Investment Co. v. Charles L. Harney, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1962No. Civ. 19569; Civ. 19546PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShoemaker, J.

We have before us two appeals: the first by defendant Charles L. Harney, Inc. from orders granting a mandatory injunction and denying its motion to reopen the case; the second by defendants Rosario Paratore and Independent Construction Company, a partnership, from an order denying their motion for attorney’s fees and trial expenses incurred in securing a release of a temporary restraining order.

Plaintiff Casitas Investment Company, a corporation, brought this action against defendant Charles L, Harney, Inc., to recover damages for loss of lateral support of plaintiff’s land, and later amended…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Mason v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1943
  2. Neumann v. MorettiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Maier v. LuceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. Lichtenfeld v. FrederickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Clark v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rynsburger v. Dairymen's Fertilizer Cooperative, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
  2. Greenly v. CooperCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Miller v. Santa Margarita Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Nuclear Electronic Laboratories, Inc. v. William C. Cornell Co.California Court of Appeal · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API