Legal Opinion

Croyle v. Smith

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 22, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

JOHNSON, J.:

¶ 1 Billie J. Croyle and Bonnie Croyle (the Croyles) appeal from the judgment entered on June 2, 2006, after the trial court denied the Croyles’ post-trial motion for a new trial. This case arises out of a collision between Billie J. Croyle’s (Croyle) motorcycle and Ray F. Smith’s (Smith) tractor trailer. Croyle was injured in the accident and as a result filed suit against Smith and his employer Sunflower Carriers, a division of Crete Carrier Corporation, Shaffer Trucking, Inc., a division of Crete Carrier Corporation, Crete Carrier Corporation and Duane W. Ackle…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harman Ex Rel. Harman v. BorahSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Commonwealth v. YoungSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Commonwealth v. GraySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. McManamon v. WashkoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ManleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In re MampeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Carletti v. Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. Arabatlian, L. v. Platt, L.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Com. v. Newkirk, C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API