Legal Opinion
Stephens v. Snyder Clinic Ass'n
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided July 17, 1981No. 52,474PublishedCited by 68 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Prager, J.:
This is an action to recover damages for alleged medical malpractice resulting from the insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). The district court held that plaintiff’s cause of action was barred by the applicable statute of limitations (K.S.A. 60-513).
On this appeal, we will assume that the following facts are true: The plaintiff-appellant, Linda Rae Stephens, is a resident of Topeka, Kansas. The defendant-appellee, Dr. James N. Winblad, M.D., is a medical doctor licensed to practice in Kansas. The defendant-appellee,…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Chase Securities Corp. v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by68 opinions
- American Bank & Trust Co. v. Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Bair v. PeckSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Samsel v. Wheeler Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1990
- Farley v. EngelkenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Austin v. LitvakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.