Legal Opinion

General Realty Co. v. Gold

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1928No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff appeals from an order striking off a judgment entered on a lease in the sum of $16,500, being for the balance of rent for the unexpired term which it is alleged became due and payable in advance because of defendant’s default in payment of a current installment of rent and removal of his goods from the premises before expiration of the term. The court below held the lease contained no authority to confess judgment for rent thus accruing in advance.

Where there is doubt or uncertainty as to the meaning of language used in a lease, it will be construed most strongly ágainst…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
  2. White v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  3. Bornstein v. SalernoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Darrow v. Keystone 5, 10, 25, $1.00 Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Larsh v. Frank & Seder of Pittsburgh, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. In Re Mount Holly Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  4. Davies v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  5. Medvidovich v. Sterner, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API