Medvidovich v. Sterner
Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Alleghany County
1Opinion of the Court
Egan, J.,
A confessed judgment cannot stand if it exceeds the power conferred in the instrument authorizing its entry. Such a judgment must rest on a foundation that will support it after *691the closest scrutiny, and one cannot take for granted that the use of a printed bookseller’s form will eliminate subsequent attacks designed to strike the judgment from the record. Where the warrant of attorney “empowers any attorney of any court within the United States or elsewhere to appear for tenant, and with or without declaration, confess judgment against tenant, etc. ...” judgment cannot be confessed…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kolf v. LiebermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
- Harwood v. Bruhn Et UxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Jordan v. KirschnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Advance-Rumely Thresher Co. v. FrederickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
- General Realty Co. v. GoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928