Legal Opinion
Larsh v. Frank & Seder of Pittsburgh, Inc.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 23, 1943No. Appeal, 29PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Patterson,
This was an action in assumpsit to recover additional rent alleged to be due under the terms of an amended lease.
The facts are not in dispute. In 1917 Robert H. Updegraff, the then owner, leased a lot of ground in the. City of Pittsburgh to the firm of Frank & Seder for a term beginning April 1,1917, and ending April 30,1938. Article II, entitled “Rents”, specified a monthly rental of $750. By Article IV, headed “Taxes and Assess ments”, the lessees covenanted to pay “in addition to the net rental reserved” all taxes which might be levied on the property during…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Williams v. NotopolosSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- McClintock & Irvine Co. v. Ætna Explosives Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Jacobs' EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
- White v. LongSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Evans v. Lincoln Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1903
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Dilks v. Flohr ChevroletSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- Northway Village No. 3, Inc. v. Northway Properties, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Darrow v. Keystone 5, 10, 25, $1.00 Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Jacob Siegel Co. v. Philadelphia Record Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Kline v. Marianne Germantown Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.