Legal Opinion

Emminger v. Motion Savers, Inc.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided July 18, 1990No. Case C-890272PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause came on to be heard upon the appeal, the transcript of the docket, journal entries and original papers from the Hamilton County Court of Common Pleas, the briefs, the arguments of counsel, and the assignments of error.

Plaintiff-appellant, Ray Emminger, Sr., the administrator of the estate of Michael Ray Emminger (Emminger), appeals from the trial court's order granting a motion for summary judgment in favor of In Motion, Inc, (Motion, Inc), Emminger's employer, on his wrongful-death claim, and in favor of Bishopric; Inc, Bishopric Products Company, and Enerfab Corporation…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Van Fossen v. Babcock & Wilcox Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Blankenship v. Cincinnati Milacron Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Jones v. VIP Development Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Sanek v. Duracote Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Kunkler v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Vermett v. Fred Christen Sons CompanyOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Felden v. Ashland Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Goodin v. Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Medina v. Harold J. Becker Co., Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Ferryman v. Conduit Pipe Prods. Co., Ca2007-02-007 (12-3-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API