Legal Opinion

State v. Friend

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 2, 1923No. 23,267PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Freeborn county and thereby charged with carnal knowledge of a female under the age of 18 years. He was put on trial in that county and found guilty. An order denying a new trial was reversed by this court for error in the admission of evidence. 151 Minn. 138, 186 N. W. 241. On the remand of the cause a change of ‘the place of trial to the adjoining county of Mower was granted at defendant’s request. After due trial in that county defendant was again convicted, a new trial was denied, and he again appeals.

The assignments of error present the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. FriendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  2. State v. BragdonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  3. Mar v. Shew Fan QuiSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
  3. State v. DoanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. State v. HolscherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  5. Ames v. CramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API