State v. Friend
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury of Freeborn county charged with the crime of carnal knowledge of a girl under the age of 18, tried in the district court for that county before Catherwood, J., and a jury and found guilty as charged in the indictment. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtDibell, J.
The defendant was convicted of the crime of carnally knowing a female child under the age of 18 years, and he appeals.
1. The offense is claimed to have been committed on October 18, 1920, in Albert Lea, in the place of business of the defendant, in which he had a room where he slept.
The evidence sustains the verdict. The girl testifies to the offense; the defendant denies it. The two were together not far from the time the girl claims it occurred, both before and-after, and at or near the defendant’s place of business. There is evidence tending to show that the defendant was engaged in a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Paulson v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
- State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. MonroeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
- State v. FitchetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- State v. EttenbergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. SpreiglSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Lovely v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- State v. SaporenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. SweeneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
- State v. GavleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.