Mar v. Shew Fan Qui
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Hennepin county to recover $500 alleged to have been lost in betting upon certain games of chance in defendants’ gambling house. The case was tried before Charles L. Smith, J., and a jury which returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $250. Erom an order denying defendants’ motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, they appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.
Action to recover money alleged to have been lost by plaintiff at gambling rooms operated by defendants in the city of Minneapolis. Plaintiff had a verdict, and defendants appealed from an order denying a new trial.
A large number of errors are assigned and discussed in the briefs. One in particular, charging irregularities in the proceedings below, received the greatest attention on the argument and in the briefs. This related to efforts on the part of the court and counsel, acting under section 4664, K. L. 1905, and occupying nearly two days, to *442discover the form of oath administered under…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Watson v. Minneapolis Street-Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Phœnix Insurance v. MoogSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Gibson v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
- Hagen v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
- Brooks v. BarthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1903
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Estate of OsbonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. FriendSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Ames v. CramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937
- Osbon v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939