State v. Bragdon
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Defendant was indicted by the grand jury, tried in the district court for Hennepin county before Fish, J., and a jury, and convicted of the crime of carnal knowledge of a female child of the age of 14 years. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, defendant appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Defendant was indicted, tried and found guilty of the charge of carnally knowing and abusing a female child of the age of 14 years. He appealed from an order denying a new trial.
The appeal brings the cause to this court upon a full and complete record of the proceedings and evidence had and taken below, and the errors complained of are embraced under some 50 odd assignments by which the rulings of the trial court, th;e sufficiency of the evidence, the conduct of the trial by the prosecuting attorneys are challenged as erroneous, prejudicial and of a character not only to justify but require a…
2Cited by6 opinions
- People v. MedcoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1955
- State v. SchifskySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Barker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1918
- State v. McPaddenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
- State v. BrodtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.