Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Danek Medical, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided March 16, 1999No. Civ. A. 3:96CV776LN, 3:96CV777LNPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

TOM S. LEE, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs Mary Coleman and Melvin Burks filed separate actions against Danek Medical, Inc., Sofamor Danek Group, Inc. and Warsaw Orthopedic, Inc. (collectively, Danek), and others, .each claiming that he/ she suffered injuries when a defective orthopedic bone screw device designed, manufactured and sold by Danek was attached to his/her spine during spinal fusion surgery performed by Dr. Bruce Senter. 1 Both cases were referred to the District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania for purposes of multi-district pretrial litigation,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Moore v. Ashland Chemical Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  3. prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,013 Mary Kathryn Thomas v. Hoffman-Laroche, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
  4. Snapp v. HarrisonMississippi Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Cather v. Catheter Technology Corp.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1991

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cano v. Everest Minerals Corp.District Court, W.D. Texas · 2005
  2. Minisan v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999
  3. Dyer v. Danek Medical, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2000
  4. McKee v. Bowers Window & Door Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Menges v. Depuy Motech, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1999

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API